OnlyFans littlethingsmingle

jerichomiles

Active member
Approved
Second picture she looks totally nude to me, although she´s covering up private parts with her hands! ;)
Yes it's called a 'handbra'. The girl below is also nude but the screen is covering the important parts too. In fact they say we're all "nude under our clothes", but I think you're kind of grossly missing the point as always. Btw the first picture you posted is also photoshopped, she's actually wearing underwear in the real picture...although you'd certainly never spot any photoshopping lol. Not that you can see anything either way though.

If only Ming had you to help her she could have made a fortune selling 'nude' pictures like this one on her onlyfans all along.
14603012-smiley-young-woman-changing-her-clothes-behind-wood-screen.jpg

It's funny how she 'looks' topless here too. It's weird the illusion you can get.
1080x1920_f8d2d1e395ab0780a60e9c949113e56f.jpg

It's the subtle difference between 'looking' nude and actually being nude on display.
 
Last edited:

pattaya69

Active member
Approved
In the video and photos of "Ming" above, you don´t see any clothes cover her body... , but what you see is still at least partial nudity!
Even if she is covering up some parts of her naked body with her hands she is still nude, as arms and hands are part of the nude body as well.

Even if you don´t see tits and pussy on this photo it s still regarded as Nude Art!

nude-art-aleksandar-nikolov.jpg

The girl you posted hiding behind a screen, is just showing her head and one shoulder, and that photo has nothing to do with nudity at all! Lol :ROFLMAO:
On the other hand... the video and photos of "Ming" that I posted you can at least see most of her naked body, she just covers her tits with her hands but she is still nude, as arms and hands are part of the body as well!
Sure you don´t see her nipples or genitals, but she is still considered nude and not covered in clothes! :rolleyes:
On Mings 2 last photos above she is not simply topless, as she clearly doesn´t have any pants, skirts or undies on, but is actually nude! 😉

"Exactly, she's not nude, only topless and we can't see since she's covering up with her hands. The video you can't even see her face and also only topless, not nude. The only topless photo is the one that's just been posted. "

So, if you walk down a street naked without clothes on, but just covering your private parts with your hands only
.... in your opinion you are not nude!? 😄
I would love to see you explain that to the lawenforcement officers when they come and drag you off the streets! Lol :ROFLMAO:
 

jerichomiles

Active member
Approved
In the video and photos of "Ming" above, you don´t see any clothes cover her body... , but what you see is still at least partial nudity!
My original statement: "She has one single topless," topless is literally partial nudity.
The girl you posted hiding behind a screen, is just showing her head and one shoulder, and that photo has nothing to do with nudity at all!
She's nude but you can't actually see anything, literally exactly the same as with Ming's photos.
On Mings 2 last photos above she is not simply topless, as she clearly doesn´t have any pants, skirts or undies on, but is actually nude!
Can you actually read? Time and time again you just simply seem simply unable to read. I'll repeat it here and in bold: "Btw the first picture you posted is also photoshopped, she's actually wearing underwear in the real picture"

In the second picture her bottom half is not even in the photo at all. Even more extreme than standing behind a screen.

Even if you don´t see tits and pussy on this photo it s still regarded as Nude Art!
It's called "nude BUT".

She's nude but you can't see anything.
She's nude but it's censored.
She's nude but she's behind a screen.
She's nude under her clothes.

Both clothing, screens or hands cover things up - literally the definition of nude and non nude.

Btw this is regarded as Art...art is probably not the most objective example to support your argument:

download.jpg

So, if you walk down a street naked without clothes on, but just covering your private parts with your hands only
.... in your opinion you are not nude!? 😄
Again we see the subtle difference between reality and photos/videos.
Capture d’écran 2022-04-20 à 9.23.53 AM.jpg
I would love to see you explain that to the lawenforcement officers when they come and drag you off the streets! Lol :ROFLMAO:
I guess she has a lot of explaining to do when the police come....unless this is just a video or a photo. In reality walking around nude you wouldn't be able to cover everything, unlike in this clever video where we can't see anything. If you CAN cover just about everything you can indeed walk around basically naked, like this girl. She's even more nude than if she was using her hands:

1476478857316.jpg
 

jerichomiles

Active member
Approved
AMEN. LOL
Unfortunately there’s no real need nudity from Ming, only one single topless photo that's just been posted. So as to not confuse Pattaya any more than he already is (easy to do), that is nudity being defined as “having nothing that block light rays from the skin of the taboo parts of a girl reaching your eyes”. Whether that’s the girl’s hands, being outside the frame of the picture, a digital censor block, mosaic pixellation, clothing, a wooden screen etc. It doesn’t really matter what it is that’s blocking the view, in the world of photo and video (not in real life), if you can’t see something, she’s not really nude…it’s called ‘censored’ in fact.

Also photoshopping clothes out of the picture doesn’t count either. Having your entire face of the picture is an even cheaper cheat too.
 

tyler_durden

Well-known member
Approved
Here to jerk and all I see are essays pls
Hey man, well that’s ok with me because I like to have sexytime while reading literally paragraphs (plural) at a time! Sorry about the humblebrag but I’m really passionate about jerking it while reading arguments on the Internets!
🍆 💦 💦 💦

[Edit] I had to go back and edit “sexy time” to “sexytime”. Once again autocorrect is wrong! 😑
 
Last edited:

tyler_durden

Well-known member
Approved
Has she posted any content on onlyfans lately? been forever since anyone posted a picture
Maybe? What I do know is that we’ve been in a dry spell for a while. Sometimes when the people who do get some good stuff they tend to hold it to themselves because they… I honestly don’t know why they won’t share? It can’t be because they hold grudges against certain members of the forum, can it? Because that would be ridiculous! 🤨
 

jerichomiles

Active member
Approved
Maybe? What I do know is that we’ve been in a dry spell for a while.
Around about since she started her onlyfans up until now lol.

Sometimes when the people who do get some good stuff they tend to hold it to themselves because they… I honestly don’t know why they won’t share?
She only shares the best stuff with those that don't share.

It can’t be because they hold grudges against certain members of the forum, can it? Because that would be ridiculous! 🤨
No don't worry about it. They won't share because they feel they're betraying Ming by doing so. But I don't get why they come here to boast there's better content than we've ever seen available but get annoyed if we don't believe it but don't post it to prove it. Either post the proof or face the fact people won't believe your claims.

I think after a certain time has passed, it's fine to share the content, you're not betraying anyone.
 
Top