OnlyFans laurenkimripley

F

fanny_mcphee

New member
I’ve literally unfollowed her on all socials. She sent a massive message to subs the other day saying she’s only doing OF out of peer pressure and will shut it down if required then sends a beg message a couple days later asking to turn auto renewal on.

For nothing more that artsy soft core it’s not worthy it at all lol
 
B

bluzepe

New member
Approved
fanny_mcphee said:
I’ve literally unfollowed her on all socials. She sent a massive message to subs the other day saying she’s only doing OF out of peer pressure and will shut it down if required then sends a beg message a couple days later asking to turn auto renewal on.

For nothing more that artsy soft core it’s not worthy it at all lol
Click to expand...
for the price, it's a big joke her content. throwing so much money at soft stuff, meh
 
H

HumptyDumpty123456

Well-known member
Approved
bluzepe said:
for the price, it's a big joke her content. throwing so much money at soft stuff, meh
Click to expand...
Well, the entire business model (not just her), is based on Caveat Emptor.
"Buyer Beware", except they don't actually allow you to know what quality the goods/services are until you have already paid. So I don't as a matter of principle. Looking at places like these is arguably the only way you get honest feedback if the content you get matches the insinuations made.

I know some feminist will be triggered reading that, but considering there's a no refund policy? and practices that would land any other business person in jail? they can do one.

As to Lauren, I noticed a photographer or 2 popping up offering to collab considering she kept using the term "classy", wanting to up the general quality as a paid arrangement. She dismissed those so obviously its a minimum effort grift. Pity as there are some out there doing soft stuff, who put a lot of production value in. Those are worth supporting IMO.
 
B

Bananapeel87

New member
HumptyDumpty123456 said:
Well, the entire business model (not just her), is based on Caveat Emptor.
"Buyer Beware", except they don't actually allow you to know what quality the goods/services are until you have already paid. So I don't as a matter of principle. Looking at places like these is arguably the only way you get honest feedback if the content you get matches the insinuations made.

I know some feminist will be triggered reading that, but considering there's a no refund policy? and practices that would land any other business person in jail? they can do one.

As to Lauren, I noticed a photographer or 2 popping up offering to collab considering she kept using the term "classy", wanting to up the general quality as a paid arrangement. She dismissed those so obviously its a minimum effort grift. Pity as there are some out there doing soft stuff, who put a lot of production value in. Those are worth supporting IMO.
Click to expand...
Even worse: a short while ago she told in a Tiktok that she was a photographer, taking portraits of dogs (at shows) and she upgraded her equipment to a Sony A7 IV or A7R IV (I forgot which one of the two). To those here who aren't familiar with photography: Sony A7 camera's are some of the best available and cost a couple of grand for just the camera itself.

So besides the quality of her content: according to her she has a good camera, yet she posts shit quality pictures. Just an easy cashgrab for her by giving it 5% effort.

Showing of her pixel tits is why we keep coming back to this thread, but compared to other creators she really lacks quality
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top